🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law could be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this global debate continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.